Chennai, January 20, 2026:
On Tuesday, the Jana Nayagan censor case took another dramatic turn when the Madras High Court put off making a final decision in the appeal filed by the Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC) against a lower court’s order to give the highly anticipated Tamil film starring actor-politician *Vijay a U/A certificate. The decision puts the film’s release, which was supposed to happen in early January, in limbo once more.
The bench, which was led by Chief Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava and Justice G Arul Murugan, heard arguments for more than three hours before officially reserving its order. This means that the judges will announce their decision at a later date. This news means that there is still no official release date for Jana Nayagan, even though fans and people in the industry are waiting for more information.
The Way to the High Court
The story began in late 2025 when the people who made Jana Nayagan sent the movie to the CBFC for approval. Even though they agreed to a number of suggested changes, such as small cuts and changes, the final certificate did not come through. An examining committee first approved the film and suggested a U/A certificate. However, a complaint was later received saying that some scenes could offend religious people and show the military in a bad light. After a long wait, the filmmakers went to the Madras High Court in early January and said that the refusal to give them a certificate was unfair and was making it hard for them to release the movie during the busy Pongal festival period.
A single-judge bench told the CBFC to give the certificate right away on January 9. This made fans and stakeholders very happy. But the CBFC quickly filed an appeal, and the division bench stayed that order, which meant that the film’s release plans were put on hold once more.
The Supreme Court’s No and Back to the HC
In the middle of January, the producers asked the Supreme Court of India for help, but the court refused to get involved and sent the case back to the Madras High Court for more review. The highest court said that the division bench was best suited to handle the case, leaving important legal questions about the certification process unanswered.
People who watch Indian cinema say this shows how complicated censorship disputes can be, since legal oversight, artistic freedom, and administrative discretion often clash. Even though Jana Nayagan was cleared in a number of foreign markets, including getting a “15” rating from the British Board of Film Classification, its home-grown certification has become a symbol of the ongoing debates about how to regulate films.
Also Read : Karnataka DGP Ramachandra Rao suspension Over Viral Video; Inquiry Ordered
How the Film Industry Reacted
People outside of the legal world have also noticed the deadlock. PC Sreeram, a veteran cinematographer, called the delay “a shame” and said that bureaucratic problems were unfairly affecting the film’s release and overshadowing its artistic merits. Filmmakers are worried that regulatory hurdles can stifle creativity and mess up well-planned distribution strategies, which is what this criticism shows.
Supporters have said that Jana Nayagan was supposed to be actor Vijay’s last movie before he became a full-time politician, which makes the uncertainty even more emotional. Others point out that delays cost producers, distributors, and theatre owners money, especially when a film’s release is tied to festival windows. Now that the bench has made its decision, everyone is waiting for the next judgement. This could either tell the CBFC to issue the U/A certificate or support the board’s appeal, which would make the certification dispute last longer. People who follow the film industry say that this decision could set a standard for how India’s courts handle future movie censorship cases.
